Total Pageviews

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Refom-a-Cons at their worst: Canadian tax dollars wasted and they even redact names to hide their identities.

Inside the $24-million, two-year federal plan to market Canadian oil

The Maple Leaf was plastered on the walls of subway stops in Washington, D.C., and it popped up in all sorts of American publications with messages like, “America’s Best Energy Partner,” and “Friends and Neighbors.”

Documents obtained by The Canadian Press offer a peek into the careful strategic considerations and internal discussions behind the $1.6-million U.S. ad campaign launched in 2013. That blitz was followed up by a $24-million, two-year international program that wraps up this month.
 
The records, released under the Access to Information Act, reveal the websites to be shunned as advertising outlets; the Internet search words that would trigger a Canadian energy ad; the coveted locations for billboards in Washington, D.C.; the rejected proposals; and the U.S. ad salesman who swarmed to grab a slice of the publicity pie.
 
Throughout the two-year campaign, the Keystone pipeline issue remained unresolved. But that doesn’t mean it failed, defenders say. In fact, the ads didn’t mention Keystone. The original call for tenders spelled out the mission: to defend Canadian energy’s reputation against hostile groups and lawmakers threatening anti-oilsands measures in the U.S. and Europe.
 
One proposed weapon for fighting back: pop-up ads.
 
Someone whose name was blacked out proposed using so-called takeover or roadblock ads that would monopolize people’s computer screens: “If we’re going to do this right, we might as well go big.”
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment