Define ‘audit’. Google it and you get this: “An official inspection of an individual’s or organization’s accounts, typically by an independent body.”
Note that last phrase, please, because it’s key to suspended Senator Mike Duffy’s defence. Audits are supposed to be free from interference. Their credibility relies on their impartiality, which is why they’re typically performed by outside experts, such as lawyers and accountants.
Apparently, the Prime Minister’s Office doesn’t use Google. Otherwise, how on earth could it have justified interfering in the 2013 report on auditing firm Deloitte’s investigation into Duffy’s expenses — and then passing off said report as the whole truth and nothing but?''''
According to RCMP documents filed at the disgraced senator’s trial, PMO staff didn’t want an audit to determine the legitimacy of Duffy’s spending habits — they wanted to use it as a tool to exonerate their embattled star Senate recruit. “A purpose of this is to put Mike in a different bucket and to prevent him from going squirrely in a bunch of weekend panel shows,” then-PMO Chief of Staff Nigel Wright emailed to his colleagues. The act of obtaining outside legal advice on Duffy’s residency issues was intended to “protect senator Duffy,” according to Senate staffer Chris Montgomery in another exchange.
READ MORE: http://www.ipolitics.ca/2015/05/07/the-duffy-trials-smoking-gun-just-blew-up-in-harpers-face/
No comments:
Post a Comment